Syndication

Visualizzazione post con etichetta Effetti dei Campi Elettromagnetici sulla Salute. Mostra tutti i post
Visualizzazione post con etichetta Effetti dei Campi Elettromagnetici sulla Salute. Mostra tutti i post

mercoledì 9 ottobre 2019

WHO vuole aggiornare la sua monografia sugli effetti delle radiofrequenze sulla salute umana

Come ben spiegato in  https://www.who.int/peh-emf/research/rf_ehc_page/en/

la monografia sulle radiofrequenze è addirittura del 1993 !  quindi con le conoscenze dell'epoca e quando la telefonia cellulare era basata sul 'molto meno dannoso'  GSM ...

Sono chiamati tutti quelli che hanno competenze tecnico scientifiche a portare il proprio contributo.

E' una opportunità che non va assolutamente persa. 


The World Health Organization’s (WHO) Radiation Programme has an ongoing project to assess potential health effects of exposure to radiofrequency (RF) electromagnetic fields in the general and working population. To prioritize potential adverse health outcomes, WHO conducted a broad international survey in 2018. Ten major topics were identified for which WHO will now commission systematic reviews to analyze and synthesize the available evidence.

Through this Call, WHO invites eligible teams to indicate their interest in undertaking a systematic review on one (or more) of the following topics:
                     SR1 – Effect of exposure to RF on cancer (human observational studies)
                     SR2 – Effect of exposure to RF on cancer (animal studies)
                     SR3 – Effect of exposure to RF on adverse reproductive outcomes (human observational studies)
                     SR4 – Effect of exposure to RF on adverse reproductive outcomes (animal and in vitro studies)
                     SR5 – Effect of exposure to RF on cognitive impairment (human observational studies)
                     SR6 – Effect of exposure to RF on cognitive impairment (human experimental studies)
                     SR7 – Effect of exposure to RF on symptoms (human observational studies)
                     SR8 – Effect of exposure to RF on symptoms (human experimental studies)
                     SR9 – Effect of exposure to RF on biomarkers of oxidative stress
                     SR10 – Effect of exposure to heat from any source and pain, burns, cataract and heat-related illness

Teams intending to respond to this Call for Expression of Interest are invited to visit http://www.who.int/peh-emf/research/rf_ehc_page/en/index.html
The closing date for this Call of Expression of Interest is 4 November 2019.

martedì 10 settembre 2019

Polarizzazione: differenza tra CEM artificiali e naturali

vedi  https://www.nature.com/articles/srep14914#abstract

Nel presente studio analizziamo il ruolo della polarizzazione nell'attività biologica dei campi elettromagnetici (EMF) / radiazione elettromagnetica (EMR).
Tutti i tipi di EMF / EMR artificiali - in contrasto con EMF / EMR naturali - sono polarizzati. Gli EMF polarizzati / EMR possono avere una maggiore attività biologica, a causa di:
1) Capacità di produrre effetti di interferenza costruttiva e amplificare le loro intensità in molti luoghi cellulari.
2) Capacità di forzare tutte le molecole cariche / polari e in particolare gli ioni liberi all'interno e intorno a tutte le cellule viventi per oscillare su piani paralleli e in fase con il campo polarizzato applicato.

 Tali oscillazioni forzate ioniche esercitano forze elettrostatiche additive sui sensori dei canali ionici elettro-sensibili della membrana cellulare, con conseguente loro gating irregolare e conseguente interruzione del bilancio elettrochimico della cellula.
Queste caratteristiche rendono gli EMF / EMR artificiali più bioattivi degli EMF / EMR naturali non ionizzanti. Ciò spiega il crescente numero di effetti biologici scoperti negli ultimi decenni da indurre dai campi elettromagnetici artificiali, diversamente dai campi elettromagnetici naturali nell'ambiente terrestre che sono sempre stati presenti nel corso dell'evoluzione, sebbene l'esposizione umana a questi ultimi sia normalmente di intensità / energia significativamente più elevate e durate più lunghe. Pertanto, la polarizzazione sembra essere un fattore scatenante che aumenta in modo significativo la probabilità di innescare effetti biologici / sulla salute


vedi anche


https://www.forbes.com/sites/cognitiveworld/2019/09/09/an-electromagnetic-health-crisis/#5ec8d39130e5.

sabato 27 luglio 2019

Due Stati Americani si pongono delle domande ...


Gli Stati USA NewHampshire ed Oregon hanno approvato delle leggi che prevedono delle commissioni tecniche alle quale è stato richiesto di capire quali danni possono venire alla popolazione dal 5G e dal wifi a bambini, a scuola.

Bene.   E' quello che chiediamo ... passare dalla certezza che  < non ci rilevanze scentifiche> al dubbio legato alla conoscenza!





Two states establish commissions to study wireless radiation health effects
New Hampshire commission to study 5G health effects; Oregon to study wireless radiation in schools

July 25, 2019

New Hampshire: House Bill 522 establishes a commission to study the environmental and health effects of 5G technology

Completed Legislative Action
Spectrum: Bipartisan Bill
Status: Passed on July 24 2019 - 100% progression
Action: 2019-07-24 - Signed by Governor Sununu 07/19/2019; Chapter 260; I. Sec. 2 Eff: 11/01/2020 II. Rem. Eff: 07/19/2019
Text: Latest bill text (Enrolled) [HTML]


HB 522 - VERSION ADOPTED BY BOTH BODIES
STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
In the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand Nineteen
Be it Enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court convened:
1  New Subdivision; Commission to Study the Environmental and Health Effects of Evolving 5G Technology.  Amend RSA 12-K by inserting after section 11 the following new subdivision:
Commission to Study the Environmental and Health Effects of Evolving 5G Technology
12-K:12  Commission Established.  There is established a commission to study the environmental and health effects of evolving 5G technology, which includes the use of earlier generation technologies.  Fifth generation, or 5G, wireless technology is intended to greatly increase device capability and connectivity but also may pose significant risks to humans, animals, and the environment due to increased radiofrequency radiation exposure.  The purpose of the study is to examine the advantages and risks associated with 5G technology, with a focus on its environmental impact and potential health effects, particularly on children, fetuses, the elderly, and those with existing health compromises.
12-K:13  Membership.
I.  The members of the commission shall be as follows:
(a)  Three members of the house of representatives, including one member from the house science, technology, and energy committee, and one member from the health, human services and elderly affairs committee, appointed by the speaker of the house of representatives.
(b)  Two members of the senate, appointed by the president of the senate.
(c)  A member of the public, appointed by the governor.
(d)  The attorney general, or designee.
(e)  Two members of the New Hampshire High Technology Council, appointed by the council.
(f)  One member representing the Business and Industry Association, appointed by the association.
(g)  One member of the New Hampshire Medical Society who specializes in environmental medicine and is familiar with electromagnetic radiation, appointed by the society.
(h)  One member representing the university system of New Hampshire knowledgeable in radiofrequency radiation, appointed by the chancellor.
(i)  One member of the cell phone/wireless technology industry, appointed by the president of the senate.
(j)  The commissioner of the department of health and human services, or designee.
(k)  One public member with expertise in the biological effects of radiofrequency radiation, appointed by the speaker of the house of representatives.
II.  Legislative members of the commission shall receive mileage at the legislative rate when attending to the duties of the commission.
III.  The members of the commission shall elect a chairperson from among the members.  The first meeting of the commission shall be called by the first-named house member.  The first meeting of the commission shall be held within 45 days of the effective date of this section.  Seven members of the commission shall constitute a quorum.
12-K:14  Duties and Reporting Requirement.  
I.  The commission shall:
(a)  Examine the health and environmental impacts from radiofrequency (RF) radiation emitted from the waves in the 30-300 gigahertz (GHZ) range of the electromagnetic spectrum, which falls somewhere between microwaves and infrared waves, and which are required with the rollout of 5G technology.
(b)  Assess the health and environmental impacts of 5G technology, which requires small cell towers to be placed at a distance of 250 meters from each other at telephone pole height from the ground and will operate in conjunction with the 3G and 4G technology infrastructure.
(c)  Receive testimony from the scientific community including but not limited to physicists and electrical engineers, the medical community including but not limited to cellular experts and oncologists, the wireless technology industry including but not limited to cell phone businesses and businesses working on the development autonomous vehicles which will rely on 5G technology, as well as other organizations and members of the public with an interest in 5G technology.  
(d)  Consider the following questions and the impact on New Hampshire citizens, municipalities, and state government of:
(1)  Why the insurance industry recognizes wireless radiation as a leading risk and has placed exclusions in their policies not covering damages caused by the pathological properties of electromagnetic radiation?
(2)  Why do cell phone manufacturers have in the legal section within the devise saying keep the phone at least 5mm from the body?
(3)  Why have 1,000s of peer-reviewed studies, including the recently published U.S. Toxicology Program 16-year $30 million study, that are showing a wide-range of statistically significant DNA damage, brain and heart tumors, infertility, and so many other ailments, being ignored by the Federal Communication Commission (FCC)?
(4)  Why are the FCC-sanctioned guidelines for public exposure to wireless radiation based only on the thermal effect on the temperature of the skin and do not account for the non-thermal, non-ionizing, biological effects of wireless radiation?
(5)  Why are the FCC radiofrequency exposure limits set for the United States 100 times higher than countries like Russia, China, Italy, Switzerland, and most of Eastern Europe?
(6)  Why did the World Health Organization (WHO) signify that wireless radiation is a Group B Possibly Carcinogenic to Humans category, a group that includes lead, thalidomide, and others, and why are some experts who sat on the WHO committee in 2011 now calling for it to be placed in the Group 1, which are known carcinogens, and why is such information being ignored by the FCC?
(7)  Why have more than 220 of the worlds leading scientists signed an appeal to the WHO and the United Nations to protect public health from wireless radiation and nothing has been done?
(8)  Why have the cumulative biological damaging effects of ever-growing numbers of pulse signals riding on the back of the electromagnetic sine waves not been explored, especially as the world embraces the Internet of Things, meaning all devices being connected by electromagnetic waves, and the exploration of the number of such pulse signals that will be created by implementation of 5G technology?
II.  The commission shall prepare and publish an interim and final report of its findings and recommendations.  The reports shall:
(a)  Outline the advantages of, and risks associated with, 5G technology running in conjunction with the 3G and 4G technology infrastructure.
(b)  Develop a strategy, if deemed necessary, to limit RF radiation exposure from 5G or lesser generation technology relying upon electromagnetic waves.
(c)  Include a public policy statement on 5G wireless systems, which either declares the technology safe or outlines actions required to protect the health of its citizens and environment.
(d)  Consider alternatives to 5G technology that will accelerate information flow speeds and volumes without the use of electromagnetic waves that emit high levels of radiation.
(e)  Provide any recommendations for proposed legislation developed by the commission.
III.  The commission shall submit the interim report required under paragraph II to the speaker of the house of representatives, the president of the senate, the house clerk, the senate clerk, the governor, and the state library on or before November 1, 2019, and shall submit the final report on or before November 1, 2020.
2  Repeal.  RSA 12-K:12 - 12-K:14 and the subdivision heading preceeding RSA 12-K:12, relative to commission to study the environmental and health effects of the evolving 5G technology, are repealed.
3  Effective Date.
I.  Section 2 of this act shall take effect November 1, 2020.
II.  The remainder of this act shall take effect upon its passage.


===
Oregon Senate Bill 283: An act relating to exposure to radiation in schools in this state; and declaring an emergency

Directs Oregon Health Authority to review peer-reviewed, independently funded scientific studies of health effects of exposure to microwave radiation, particularly exposure that results from use of wireless network technologies in schools and to report results of review to interim committee of Legislative Assembly related to education not later than January 2, 2021.

--

80th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY--2019 Regular Session

Senate Bill 283: Enrolled Bill Text

AN ACT Relating to exposure to radiation in schools in this state; and declaring an emergency.

Be It Enacted by the People of the State of Oregon:

SECTION  1. (1)(a) The Oregon Health Authority shall:

(A) Review peer-reviewed, independently funded scientific studies of the health effects of exposure to microwave radiation, particularly exposure that results from  the use of wireless network technologies in schools or similar environments; and

(B) Report the results of the review to an interim committee of the Legislative Assembly related to education not later than January 2, 2021.

(b) The review described in paragraph (a) of this subsection must, at a minimum, consist of a literature review of peer-reviewed, independently funded scientific studies that examine the health effects of exposure to microwave radiation on children.

(2) The Department of Education shall develop recommendations to schools in this state for practices and alternative technologies that would reduce students’ exposure to microwave radiation that the review described in subsection (1) of this section identifies as harmful.

SECTION  2. This 2019 Act being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety, an emergency is declared to exist, and this 2019  Act takes effect on its  passage.