mercoledì 4 marzo 2020

Vertenza legale in USA per EHS di tre bimbi a causa di torre eoliche

3 ragazzi hanno accusato sintomi da elettrosensibilità dopo la installazione di 100 torre eoliche a 700 m dalla loro casa.

Dopo fuga a 8 Km di distanza hanno fatto causa alla società elettrica.

In giudizio le evidenze mediche sono state contestate, ma il giudice le ha riconosciute congrue di una situazione di disagio fisico che andava indennizzato.

Tenendo conto della consistenza delle prove il giudice ha deciso per un risarcimento di 225000$.

Three children receive €225,000 settlement over alleged illnesses caused by windfarm near family home

The three children claimed that they had to leave their family home months after a nearby windfarm began operation.

Image: Shutterstock/paxan_semenov
THREE SIBLINGS WHO claimed their family had to abandon their home due to illnesses allegedly caused by a nearby windfarm have secured €225,000 as a settlement of their High Court damages claims.
The awards, were part of settlements made without admission of liability, made to Laura, David and Jack Kelleher.
The siblings claimed that they, along with their parents, had to leave their family home at Gowlane North, Donoughmore, Cork in late 2016 several months after a ten-turbine wind farm went into operation.
They claimed that the noise, vibrations and shadow flicker from the turbines, located just over 700m from their family farm, resulted in them suffering from various illnesses.
These included nosebleeds, ear aches, skin rashes, swollen and painful hands, loss of power in their limbs, sleep disturbance, and headaches.
Through their father Valentine Kelleher, the three siblings sued Green Energy Supply Ltd, which owns and operates a wind turbine installation known as Knockduff Wind Farm in Cork.
The actions were also against company director Michael Murnane of Gortyleahy, Macroom, Cork, who is the owner of Green Energy Supply.
The defendants had denied all the claims they had been negligent resulting in the siblings becoming ill.
They also denied that noise, shadow flicker and vibration from the windfarm had intruded onto the family’s farm.
Medical evidence contested
The case came before Ms Justice Leonie Reynolds on Tuesday, who was informed by John Rogers SC for the Kellehers that the case had been settled.
Liability was not admitted in any of the actions, and counsel said that medical evidence submitted in support of the Kelleher’s claim was fully contested.
The judge, noting the dispute over the medical reports and that liability remained in issue in the cases, described the offer as “good”.
In their action, the Kellehers sought damages for alleged nuisance and personal injury they claimed was due to the defendants failure to take sufficient precautions to avoid noise, vibration and shadow flicker from the windfarm.
It was further alleged that the defendants failed to operate the windfarm in a manner to avoid causing unreasonable levels of noise, vibrations and shadow flicker nor did the defendants pay any heed to the complaints.
The siblings claimed the windfarm was operated in a manner that did not respect their constitutional family, personal and property, rights.
Symptoms eased
The Kellehers claimed that they started experiencing health problems in and around their family farm from May 2016.
They claimed they had to moved out of their home in November 2016.
After spending some time in a hotel, the family has relocated to a property at Ballyglass, Grenagh, Co Cork, which is eight miles away from their farm.
They claimed that their symptoms eased after they moved away, but returned if they spent any time attending at or assisting on the family farm.
The defendants in denying the claims, or that the Kellehers’ constitutional rights had been breached, said that the windfarm was operated in a lawful manner.
Counsel told the court that the settlement, including the ruling of the awards, arose following mediation between the parties conducted by retired Judge Paul Gilligan.
He said that given the circumstances, especially given that the medical evidence was hotly contested, he was recommending that the settlement offers be approved by the court.
Counsel said that as part of the settlement Laura (aged 15) whose ailments were more severe compared to her brothers was to receive €125,000. Her brothers David (aged 17) and Jack (aged 10) were to receive €50,000, counsel added.
Counsel said that other separate but related claims brought by members of the Kelleher family for alleged nuisance remain outstanding, but he was hopeful that they would be resolved.
Those cases were adjourned to a date in March.

Stop 5G Olanda fa causa al suo Governo

La Fondazione Stop5GNL ha intentato un procedimento legale  contro il governo olandese, per impedirne la diffusione del 5G.
La fondazione ritiene che lo spiegamento di antenne e CEM sia illegale perché non protegge i cittadini dalle conseguenze dell'esposizione alle radiazioni del 5G.
5G significa un aumento delle torri di trasmissione e dei piccoli trasmettitori (celle strette), specialmente nelle aree densamente popolate. Secondo la fondazione, il 5G non è stato adeguatamente studiato per i rischi per la salute. Il gruppo ha affermato che gli studi condotti su 2G, 3G e 4G hanno mostrato effetti dannosi per l'uomo, gli animali e le piante e che l'aumento dell'intensità di radiazione per il 5G avrà un impatto importante sulle persone e sull'ambiente.

Stop5GNL ritiene che le linee guida sulle radiazioni sono obsolete e non offrano protezione contro questi effetti dannosi.

The Stop5GNL Foundation has filed a suit summary proceedings against the Dutch government, to stop it from rolling out 5G. The foundation believes the deployment is unlawful because it does not protect citizens against the consequences of radiation exposure from 5G.
5G means an increase in transmission towers and small transmitters (narrow cells), especially in densely built-up areas. According to the foundation, 5G has not been adequately investigated for health risks. The group said that the studies performed for 2G, 3G and 4G have shown harmful effects for humans, animals and plants, and that the increase in radiation intensity for 5G will have a major impact on people and the environment. 
Stop5GNL believes the outdated radiation guidelines offer no protection against these harmful effects.

lunedì 2 marzo 2020

5G e MIMO: inconsistenza della procedura di misurazione della esposizione

Segnalo questo intervento tecnico dell'Ing Palio presente in:

che spiega - anche in modo chiaro per i non-tecnici - il funzionamento delle antenne MIMO che caratterizzano il 5G.

domenica 1 marzo 2020

Appello di Arthur Firstenberg

Dear EMF Scientists, Medical Doctors, and Activists,

We must all make an effort at communication, cooperation and action, now, if we want to survive. Already there are few insects left on Earth, and birds and bats are starving by the billions. SpaceX’s Starlink satellites, when and if they go into service, threaten to put a sudden end to life on Earth later this year.

Yet people are going about their business as if everything is fine. The human race is accelerating, like lemmings, toward a precipice that it does not even know is there. 

The knowledge necessary to change course is possessed by us. Whether we also possess the power to actually do anything to change the course -- to even slow down the rush toward the cliff -- is unknown to me. I doubt it, but I cannot stand by knowing that life on earth is about to end, without doing what I can to try to prevent it. My own life is worth little. But Life Itself is precious and worth fighting for. I assume that you all care about this earth too. But there are some important questions whose answers we so far have not been able to agree on, which limits our effectiveness.

I offer the following, by way of beginning the discussion.

First, very briefly about myself, for those who do not know me well. I will be 70 years old this year. I have been involved in EMF issues since I was 16 years old as a research fellow in an electrophysiology lab at Downstate Medical Center in Brooklyn when I was in the 11th and 12th grades. I was a winner of the Westinghouse Science Talent Search in 1967 for my work in that lab. I studied mathematics and physics at Cornell University. I went to medical school at the University of California, Irvine. I was injured by X-rays midway through medical school, and had to quit one year short of getting my M.D., in order to save my life.

While still in medical school I studied acupressure, shiatsu and kiatsu, and learned acupuncture theory from Chinese and Korean textbooks. Later I studied and became a certified practitioner of the Feldenkrais and Rubenfeld Synergy Methods of healing, which deal with the structural and energetic systems of the body.


1. Is there a dose response for RF radiation?
2. Is wireless technology safe at any level?
I say no. I have already sent some of you a list of studies that support my opinion. But I know it from personal experience. On November 14, 1996, Omnipoint Communications (now T-Mobile) began commercial service of the first digital (2G) cell phone network in New York City from 600 rooftop installations. Within 4 days I could not eat or sleep, my head was roaring like a train, my eyes felt like they were popping out of my head, and my skin was so sensitive I couldn’t bear to be touched. Three times during the 5th night my vocal cords went into spasm so that I could not take a breath in or out. On the 6th morning I grabbed my sleeping bag, got on the Long Island Railroad, and barely escaped with my life.

I was sure that the radiation levels in my apartment were sky high, but I was proven wrong. I hired EMF consultant Stuart Maurer to go down to my apartment with his spectrum analyzer and take measurements. The peak radiation level that had almost killed me in less than a week was
0.0001 μW/cm2 (microwatts per square centimeter) -- less than the radiation levels on much of the Earth today.

I was certain that people were being killed all over New York City by this low level of radiation, and I was proven right. I telephoned Dr. John Goldsmith in Israel and he instructed me how to get weekly mortality statistics for 121 cities from the Centers for Disease Control. The death rate in New York City rose 17% on the day the Omnipoint antennas began service, and remained that elevated for three months. I analyzed weekly mortality statistics for many U.S. cities. In each city, mortality increased between 15% and 30% on the day that city’s 2G service began, and remained elevated for three to four months in each city. I calculated that the installation of 2G in the U.S. in 1996-1997 had killed at least 10,000 people outright.

Here in Santa Fe, Verizon Wireless upgraded its service last month. When I am near a Verizon antenna now, I have a headache, nausea, and a swelling sensation in my throat. It doesn’t matter what the power level is. I have a headache from a Verizon antenna where the power density is 0.03 μW/cm2, and no headache from an AT&T antenna where the power density is 15.2 μW/cm2.

In addition, I feel normal in the middle of Santa Fe, where there are lots of cell towers and levels of radiation are high, but I am falling-over dizzy in remote locations in New Mexico where cell phones don’t even work and the levels are barely measurable. The explanation has nothing to do with power levels. The earth underneath Santa Fe, all the way down to mid-mantle, is more highly conductive than most other places on earth. What most EMF scientists are missing is that the electrical properties of the earth are as important as the electrical properties of the wireless signals we are bathed in. And of all the properties of wireless signals, power level is the least important for health and environment. Wireless kills, period, at any level. And it is about to kill us all, and all the insects, birds and animals, unless we wake up and put a halt to it, now. Starting with the satellites.

3. Is wireless technology from Space safe at any level?

I say no, again from personal experience as well as academic research. Satellites orbiting in the ionosphere are far more dangerous than terrestrial antennas, not because of the radiation levels at the surface of the Earth, but because the ionosphere controls the global electrical circuit. The global electrical circuit provides the energy of life that is identical to the qi of Chinese medicine and the prana of Ayurvedic medicine. If you pollute the global circuit with millions of pulsed, modulated signals, you will destroy every living thing.

As I document in my book, The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life, even the first 28 military satellites, launched in 1968, caused disease on Earth. And the first set of satellites for cell phone service -- Iridium’s 66 satellites -- sickened people and animals everywhere. Iridium went into service on September 23, 1998. On that morning exactly, people all over the world who call themselves electrically sensitive (ES) became suddenly deathly ill. I know because on October 1, 1998, I conducted a telephone survey of 57 ES people in 6 countries; contacted 2 ES support groups; and interviewed 2 nurses and one physician who served that population. I know because on the morning of
September 23, 1998, I myself became deathly ill. I also lost my sense of smell on that morning and it has not returned to this day. The mortality rate in the United States rose by 5 percent for two weeks after the commencement of Iridium’s service.

Birds were affected too. It was pigeon racing season, and in early October, newspapers reported huge losses of homing pigeons in much of the United States. Pigeon racers whom I contacted told me that not only did they lose all their pigeons, but few wild birds were seen in the sky for several weeks. And the sport of pigeon racing has not recovered.

When Iridium came out of bankruptcy and resumed service on March 30, 2001, it was foaling season, and newspapers reported spontaneous abortions and foal deaths among very expensive race horses in many countries. I also received reports from people far and wide of nausea, flu-like illness, and feelings of oppression. As I did when Globalstar, a second satellite phone service, began operation on February 28, 2000 with 48 satellites. As I did when Iridium added data and Internet to its satellite service on June 5, 2001. Such reports did not only come from people labeled ES.

That was, respectively, 66 and 48 satellites -- still the only low-orbit satellites providing cell phone service today. The prospect of 12,000 or more satellites is a global emergency. Even the first 1,000 of those satellites, if they are put into operation later this year, as SpaceX would like to do, threatens to put an end to all of life.

4. Should you sign or promote the International Appeal to Stop 5G on Earth and in Space (“5G Space Appeal”)?

The EMF Scientists Appeal has only 200 signatures. The 5G Space Appeal has 200 thousand signatures, including 5,000 scientists. Yet many who signed the EMF Scientists Appeal have declined to sign the 5G Space Appeal, some because it is not just for scientists and some because they are not experts on space.

What is happening in space is an emergency. I invite you to sign the 5G Space Appeal if you haven’t already, and to circulate it to your colleagues. It is a meticulous, thoroughly referenced, accurate document. 200 signatures will not halt the rush toward the cliff. Neither will 200 thousand signatures. We need millions of signatures, and we need the climate change community. We need to be the catalysts to wake up this world, before it is too late.

5.  “If not me, who?”

Most people who call me for information are calling on their cell phones. Most people who are signing the 5G Space Appeal are signing it on their cell phones. Everyone wants their cell phone but they want me to stop 5G for them and it is impossible. They need their cell phone when they travel. They need it for their business. They need it for their family. They need it for their friends. Or they think 4G is safe, but not 5G. Or they “only” have a flip phone. Or, thinking they are doing good for the planet, they keep their phone “only for emergencies.” They think their phone is not irradiating the birds and the insects and their neighbors like the towers are. They think that if they keep the phone at some distance from their head, that they are safe, because they believe there is a dose response. They think that if they only keep their phone for emergencies, the towers do not have to be there. But if even one person wants to be able to use a cell phone wherever they go in case of an emergency, the entire wireless infrastructure of the planet has to be there. Which means no insects, no birds, and very shortly no life and no planet. And there is not just one person who wants to be able to use a cell phone in an emergency, there are seven billion.

Can we, the EMF scientists, doctors and activists, lead the way by example? Walking the walk, not just talking the talk? Throwing away our phones.

It seems to me that this is the most important question, and the only hope for averting catastrophe. If even we can’t do it, no one else will.

It is abundantly clear that we are losing -- losing the fight and losing our planet -- because for almost everyone on earth, the danger from EMFs is an abstraction. It is noise, like the buzzing of a fly, and nothing more. Government officials cannot hear it. Judges cannot hear it. They look at the supplicants before them, who are talking some nonsense that makes no sense to them, and who are also treating it like an abstraction.
So many of the EMF scientists own cell phones. So many of the EMF activists own cell phones.

I went to a public hearing last week, where I testified that a proposed hotel should not be built because there is a cell tower 20 yards away, whose antenna is aimed at where the hotel would be. The neighboring office suites, once filled with lawyers and other businesses, have emptied out since that antenna was installed. The Planning Commissioners ignored me. I gave them an email from the last remaining office tenant, a lawyer who is about to vacate her office because she has severe nosebleeds and dizziness when she is at work. I gave them a doctor’s letter from a woman who is about to close her jewelry shop below those offices because she has headaches, nosebleeds and heart palpitations when she is at work. The Commissioners acted like I was not there, like the documents I had given them did not exist. The lawyer did not testify herself because she was afraid. The jewelry shop owner did not testify herself because she was afraid. Everyone is afraid, and everyone has a cell phone. No one is showing by their actions that they believe what they are saying, except a few people like me who are as rare as pterodactyls.

It doesn’t matter if we get a million signatures, if everyone is signing on their cell phone. It doesn’t matter if we have a million studies, if the researchers act like they don’t believe their results. Who is going to set the example? Who is going lead the world in a different direction?

Hillel said it best: “If not now, when? If not me, who?”

Arthur Firstenberg
P.O. Box 6216
Santa Fe, NM 87502
phone: +1 505-471-0129

sabato 29 febbraio 2020

Fondo Immobiliare tedesco: dice NO al 5G!


No 5G - proteggere i nostri inquilini dalle radiazioni dannose dei telefoni cellulari

Christoph Marloh MRICS Real Estate 24 FreseniusAmburgo, 27 febbraio 2020. A causa dei notevoli rischi per la salute associati alla tecnologia mobile 5G, Grundbesitz 24 ha vietato agli operatori mobili di installare e utilizzare strutture 5G su tutte le proprietà residenziali gestite con effetto immediato.
Divieto di strutture 5G
Secondo i rapporti della stampa, gli operatori di telefonia mobile stanno pianificando di iniziare l'installazione di strutture 5G a Berlino e in altre città tedesche nel 2020.
In più di 500 studi, tuttavia, sono stati rilevati significativi rischi per la salute derivanti dalle radiazioni dei telefoni cellulari (vedi sotto Joel Moskowitz: "Non abbiamo motivo di credere che il 5G sia sicuro", Scientific American dal 17 ottobre 2019 ).
A causa dei rischi per la salute delle strutture 5G, 269 scienziati hanno chiesto alla Commissione europea di impedire l'espansione delle reti 5G (vedi appello sul 5G ).
252 scienziati di 43 nazioni avevano precedentemente chiesto una riduzione delle emissioni nocive delle reti 2G, 3G e 4G (vedi Appello di scienziato EMF ).
Data questa situazione di fatto, il comportamento delle compagnie di telefonia mobile è incomprensibile ed è respinto dalla proprietà 24.
Non ci saranno operazioni di strutture 5G sulle proprietà del gruppo.
Informazioni degli inquilini sui rischi esistenti con radiazioni radio nel 2020
Il danno cellulare, il cancro e l'infertilità possono già essere dimostrati essere causati dalle reti 2G, 3G e 4G, nonché dai dispositivi WiFi e DECT esistenti.
Per sostenere uno stile di vita sano, Grundbesitz 24 fornisce consulenza a tutti gli inquilini di questi rischi e fornisce suggerimenti su come ridurli ed evitarli. Nel 2020, tutti gli inquilini riceveranno le schede informative dal BUND Landesverband Hamburg eV e dalla Diagnosi Radio - Ambiente e Organizzazione dei consumatori per la protezione dalle radiazioni elettromagnetiche e. V. consegnato.
Maggiori informazioni sono disponibili su:
A proposito di immobili residenziali tedeschi
Il settore immobiliare residenziale tedesco è sempre stato considerato un fattore stabilizzante e sta diventando sempre più un sostituto delle obbligazioni. Fondazioni, fondi pensione e clienti privati ​​che aumentano la propria quota immobiliare hanno partecipato al fondo speciale di Grundbesitz 24.
Informazioni sulla missione Investire con la vita sostenibile
Mission Investing consente alle fondazioni di utilizzare il proprio capitale sociale ai fini della fondazione. Il mercato immobiliare tedesco è attualmente particolarmente adatto a questo. Lo spazio abitativo sta diventando sempre più scarso nelle città dinamiche. Grazie alla gestione a misura di inquilino e alla modernizzazione energetica a basso costo, le fondazioni possono dare un contributo al mantenimento delle strutture sociali e alla protezione delle risorse - con la prospettiva di entrate stabili, non cicliche e aumenti di valore continui. Ulteriori informazioni sono disponibili su
Informazioni sulla proprietà 24
Grundbesitz 24 è uno specialista nell'acquisto, sviluppo e gestione socialmente ed ecologicamente sostenibile di immobili residenziali. L'attenzione si concentra sulle regioni metropolitane tedesche. Ulteriori informazioni: .

domenica 23 febbraio 2020

IEEE: oltre gli effetti termici

"Abbiamo prove sperimentali più che sufficienti per mettere in discussione la validità della formulazione di standard che tengano conto solo degli effetti termici".

Questo pezzo di  Raymond S. Kasevich è stato pubblicato da IEEE Spectrum 18 anni fa. "IEEE Spectrum è la rivista e il sito Web di punta dell'IEEE, la più grande organizzazione professionale del mondo dedicata all'ingegneria e alle scienze applicate.

                            Il nostro statuto è di tenere informati oltre 400.000 membri sulle principali tendenze e sviluppi in tecnologia, ingegneria e scienza. I nostri blog , podcast, storie di notizie e funzionalità, video e infografiche interattive coinvolgono i nostri visitatori con chiare spiegazioni su concetti e sviluppi emergenti con dettagli che non possono trovare altrove ".

Cosa ci vorrà per superare la "profonda negazione" dei governi e dell'industria delle telecomunicazioni?
Quanti anni ancora dobbiamo aspettare per le norme sulle radiazioni elettromagnetiche che proteggono la salute umana e ambientale?

martedì 18 febbraio 2020

Azione legale storica contro il FCC

Comunicato stampa di Environmental Health Trust

Ce l'abbiamo fatta! Con il sostegno di generosi donatori da tutto il mondo, EHT ha raccolto i fondi necessari per presentare un'azione legale storica contro la FCC per le sue normative wireless non protettive, inadeguate e obsolete.

Il 31 gennaio 2020 abbiamo presentato istanza presso la Corte d'appello degli Stati Uniti per il Circuito del Distretto di Columbia.