Visualizzazione post con etichetta bando. Mostra tutti i post
Visualizzazione post con etichetta bando. Mostra tutti i post

sabato 27 gennaio 2018

Il Ministro francese della Istruzione conferma (10.12.17) il bando dei telefoni cellulari

by André Fauteux

Without banning tablets however, he admitted that screens are a "public health issue". "We have studies showing that exposure to the screens of children under seven is a health problem. It is good that children are not too much, if at all, in front of screens before the age of seven, "said Minister Jean-Michel Blanquer on the TV show Le Grand Jury RTL-Le Figaro. LCI.
The cell phone ban was promised by French President Emmanuel Macron during his election campaign. Last September, the largest federation of pupil parents’ associations evoked "an appalling logistics problem". The minister replied that details of the ban are still in development. « You may need a cell phone for educational purposes or emergency situations. It has to be confined, which in passing already exists: there are colleges that already do it. "
The Generation New Technologies 
website commented: "With more than eight out of ten adolescents already equipped, the presence of the mobile phone in school or college can create disruption during classes and tensions in the student-teacher relationship but also from student to student. However, the application of such a ban, while it may be desirable during classes, may be more difficult between courses, since parents want to be able to reach their children. On the other hand, checking that students have left their phone in the planned confinement space is already rather complicated. "
For the association PRIARTEM (French acronym of To Gather, Inform and Act on the Risks Related to Electromagnetic Technologies), the minister "sends parents a clear message: a cell phone is not compatible with good conditions of learning because its use does not favor concentration. If this is true at school, it is true also outside school grounds. "
The Association adds that microwaves emitted by cells and tablets in Wi-Fi mode are also detrimental to concentration and academic performance: "Even if this is not the stated objective, this decision is in line with the French Health Safety Agency ANSES’s recommendation to reduce children's exposure to radio frequencies and, in particular, those transmitted by mobile phones.PRIARTEM invites the Minister not to stop in this way. Laptops are not good for kids' health, tablets are not good either. The Minister's statement on the screens is, in fact, a serious challenge to the Digital Plan at School which aimed to equip children with tablets as soon as possible (from kindergarten).'' 

sabato 23 maggio 2015

Richmond, California contro le armi che usano radiazioni

E' preoccupante scoprire  che - in questi giorni -  il consiglio comunale di questo comune (107.000 abitanti!) ha approvato una risoluzione di bando di tutte quelle armi che sfruttano, tra l'altro, vari tipi di campi elettromagnetici, ed altro) per ottenere un controllo mentale di persone.

Mi colpisce come già nel 2001 c'è stata una proposta di legge al Congresso USA (che però non credo sia andata a buon file - ho chiesto dettagli -  ) in cui si chiede il bando di armi tra cui sistemi che direzioni flussi di energia , atomica, radiazioni elettromagnetiche (RF, ELF, ULF) ... inoltre si specifica tra l'altro tra gli 'exotic weapons' ci sono :  chemtrails  (NB!)  , armi elettroniche, psicotroniche, sistemi spaziali basati su radiazioni con frequenze ultrabasse, etc. ....



By Melissa Dykes [1]Global Research, May 21, 2015Truthstream Media
[2] 20 May 2015

The numbers are at least in the hundreds of thousands at this point.

Every once in a while, a little piece of this trend rises to the
surface and makes its way into mainstream headlines, if even at a
local level as is the case with the recent news that the Richmond,
California City Council
which just passed a resolution “in support
of the Space Preservation Act and the Space Preservation Treaty to
permanently ban spaced-based weapons”.

Via San Jose Mercury News [3]:

Few societal threats escape the watchful eye of the Richmond City
Council, so it was no surprise Tuesday night that it voted its
opposition to airborne weapons systems that have allegedly targeted
residents with mind-control technology. You read that correctly.

After a dozen professed victims told of pain suffered from
chemtrails, particle beams and electromagnetic radiation, the council
voted 5-2 in favor of Councilwoman Jovanka Beckles’ resolution “in
support of the Space Preservation Act and the Space Preservation
Treaty to permanently ban spaced-based weapons,” with Mayor Tom
Butt [4] and Councilman Vinay Pimple [5] dissenting. [What
unfortunate names…]

“I’m just a dumb city council person,” Butt said, “and this
is way, way over my head. I frankly think it’s way out of the
purview of what this city council should be taking up.”

Colleague Nat Bates was more understanding: “I’m going to support
the resolution for the simple reason that we have voted on a lot of
dumb ideas.”

With a population of nearly 108,000 people in 2013, Richmond is no
small town… and this is just one example of one town in one state in
our country where at least a dozen people felt the need to speak out
about what they believe is happening to them.

While these council members can poke fun and make light of this,
guaranteed the people suffering what they believe is never ending
electronic harassment by the government don’t think it’s very
humorous at all.

And the numbers of those people who do believe that appear to be
growing exponentially.

The purpose of the Space Preservation Act of 2001 [6], introduced by
former U.S. Representative Dennis Kucinich, was to reaffirm it “is
the policy of the United States that activities in space should be
devoted to peaceful purposes for the benefit of all mankind.”

The bill would have permanently banned all space-based weapons and
the termination of testing and developing them. It further
specifically defined “weapon” in part as a device capable of
“Inflicting death or injury on, or damaging or destroying, a
person” via “the use of land-based, sea-based, or space-based
systems using radiation, electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic, laser,
or other energies directed at individual persons or targeted
populations for the purpose of information war, mood management, or
mind control of such persons or populations.”

It further noted that this would include “exotic weapons systems”
such as electronic, psychotronic, or information weapons; chemtrails;
high altitude ultra low frequency weapons systems; plasma,
electromagnetic, sonic, or ultrasonic weapons; laser weapons systems;
strategic, theater, tactical, or extraterrestrial weapons; and
chemical, biological, environmental, climate, or tectonic weapons.

The bill, of course, got lost in committees and never passed. Not
that our government would even bother to pass such a bill in the first
place as a token gesture, but even if they had, considering most of
the projects listed above are all like top secret or even above top
secret military projects, it wouldn’t have been enforced anyway.

We only hear about some of the space weapons coming out now and then
in the news or via the patent office, and guaranteed whatever we hear
about, you know they likely have something years more advanced we have
no idea about because the American public is on a need-to-know basis
and long ago at least back to the late-1800s when they were developing
and secretly testing electric airships, the government decided we
don’t need to know.

We are currently being told microwave energy weapons are still a
“conspiracy theory,” even as Boeing recently patented a Star
Wars-style force field capable of “producing a plasma field between
the target and the explosion using lasers, electricity and

However, the bottom line here is that so many American citizens are
now publicly complaining of electronic harassment of various types at
the hands of our government that city councils are being forced by
their constituency to take up resolutions about it.

The truth cannot be buried forever

City Council Votes to Ban Mind Control Weapon Use Against Residents


City Council Votes to Ban Mind Control Weapon Use... [9]
It’s hard to even guesstimate the number of people, not just in
America but around the world, who feel they are being targeted by
space age directed energy mind con...

View on [10]
Preview by Yahoo

[6] https://www.fasorg/sgp/congress/2001/hr2977.html

venerdì 1 marzo 2013

Il Belgio mette al bando il telefono cellulare per bambini sotto i 7 anni

Mobile phones to be banned for children

The Belgian government has announced measures to restrict the use of mobile phones by young children. Feb 28, 2013

Public Health minister Laurette Onkelinx has announced that sales of mobile phones to children under 7 years will be banned in shops and also on the internet.

Adverts for mobile phones during children's programmes on TV radio and the internet will also be banned.

Research shows than in Belgium every two out of three children under 10 years have a mobile phone. At 12 years they nearly all have one.

The minister has highlighted the radiation risk from cell phones which is higher for young children than adults.

NG / Together Magazine / Expatica 


Belgium: New Measures to Protect Children from Mobile Phones

Details concerning new measures aimed at protecting children from mobile phones
RTBF, 25 February 2013 (translated from French)

Today, the majority of teenagers are hooked on mobile phones. The latest report of the International Agency for Research on Cancer of the World Health Organization (WHO) considers that its use is “possibly carcinogenic for humans” and that intensive use is dangerous. It did not need more for the Belgian authorities to react. There will be rules to follow.
The Ministers for Health and for Consumer Affairs are encouraging a better protection of young users. In order to limit use, there will be rules to follow which mainly concern sales and advertising. 

There will no longer be advertising specifically targeting children younger than 14 years of age. Sellers will be obliged to inform their customers of the “specific absorption rate” of mobile phones, that is, the level of radiation of the device. The sale of mobile phones specifically designed for young children up to age 7 will be banned in Belgium. 

« Possibly carcinogenic »
For the government, these are preventive measures. The desire to particularly protect children lies principally in the fact that, cumulatively, they will be potentially exposed longer to waves during the course of their lives. 

« International studies clearly state that it is possibly carcinogenic ». If a risk exists, protection is necessary,” declared the Minister for Health, Laurette Onkelinx, to RTBF. This royal decree is her initiative, along with that of her colleague in charge of consumer protection, Johan Vande Lanotte.

The draft royal decree will be examined Friday in the Council of Ministers. 

The Minister for Health has also announced the drafting, between now and the end of the year, of another royal decree aimed at rendering obligatory the sale of a headset with mobile phones. 

“A child’s brain is a developing organ.”
Health risks (essentially, brain cancer) caused by wireless communication systems are the subject of scientific studies for which there are “diverging opinions”, stresses Luc Verschaeve, of the Institute of Public health (ISP). “There are a number of doubts and some indications of a possible risk”, he said. 

In the 1.00 pm news on « La Première », Jacques Vanderstraeten, medical consultant to the « conseil supérieur » of health, explains that if these new rules aim principally to protect young persons, it is because « the brain of a child is a developing organ and thus, more sensitive to any eventual external influence » and that it is better to prevent than to cure. 

According to a study by Crioc, the association for consumer defense, more than 90% of young persons aged 12 to 17 have a mobile phone. Dating from 2011, this study also showed that within this age range, nearly all 13-year-olds have a mobile phone. 

Also, according to WHO, phoning half an hour a day for 10 years increases the likelihood of developing a glioma (malignant brain tumor) by 40%. 

Translation by Meris Michaels
Original text in French :

A ban on mobile phones designed for children under 7, Feb 25, 2013

Public Health minister Laurette Onkelinx (Francophone socialist) has announced measures to tackle the use of mobile phones by young children. The measures apply to publicity and to the direct sales of cell phones for children. 


Joel M. Moskowitz, Ph.D.
Center for Family and Community Health
The UC Berkeley Prevention Research Center
School of Public Health
University of California, Berkeley

EMR Safety:
Twitter: @berkeleyprc

sabato 15 dicembre 2012

Il Presidente della principale società di telefonia belga NON vuole Wifi nel piano dive c'è il suo ufficio !!!

Inoltre non vuole che si telefoni al suo telefono cellulare !!!
Inoltre ha partecipato ad un incontro con i ragazzi a scuola sui pericoli di Internet, ma anche della pericolosità del GSM


The head of Belgium’s largest cellphone company bans WI-FI from his offices and tells kids cellphones are dangerous!

From Andre Fauteux, Editor
La Maison du 21e siècle magazine:
The head of Belgacom is not crazy about the Wi-Fi fad in his cellphone company’s skyscraper. The 27th floor, occupied by management, thus goes without the technology that allows high speed broadband Internet access. The decision is barely surprising when we know that Didier Bellens also asks his contacts to call him on his landline rather than on his cell.
The man who heads Belgacom, and thus Proximus, briefed schoolchildren Tuesday about the dangers of the Internet, in the charming company of (tennis player) Justine Henin. The initiative was organized with Child Focus and Microsoft.
Didier Bellens, president of Belgacom (Belgium cell operator), explains that the GSM (Global System for Mobile Communications) is dangerous – (Sudpresse – 25/11/2011). And when a child asks about the dangers of cellphones, the head of the country’s largest cellphone company does not mince his words. He explains to pupils of the Centre of Woluwe-Saint-Pierre school that GSM is bad and a health threat.
“During the day, it is better to use a headset because the GSM, it heats,” he first explained. “The waves are dangerous. At night, it is better to shut it off. If you use your phone as an alarm clock, you should also turn it off.”…
Contacted, Belgacom’s spokesperson was not surprised by his employers comments: ”Didier Bellens is only indicating the precautionary principles recommended by the World Health Organization. Remember that nothing has ever been proven about the dangers of GSM…”
Andre Fauteux, Editor
La Maison du 21e siècle magazine
2955 Domaine-lac-Lucerne
Ste-Adèle (Qc) Canada J8B 3K9